Four important criteria concerning the evaluation of room 206 in the Math and Physics building include the quality of learning, quality of surroundings and furnishings, how this building compares to others on campus, and if the building is safe.
Quality of learning is possibly the most important criteria for this review because as a university the number one priority should be the the education students receive. If a university has the means of updating the conditions in which students learn they should. I as a student hate having to learn in bottom of the barrel conditions because the dreary, dilapidated conditions don’t encourage me to learn. Room 206 is dark and rundown and makes me tired and focus on other things rather than learning my professors lesson.
Quality of surroundings connects with the quality of learning and the reasons I mentioned above. It’s unsatisfactory that the upholstery on seats is worn and springs are sticking through the holes. When a classroom is falling down and wearing out I as the student don’t feel like a top priority. If I were, the classroom I go to learn in would be in better condition.
If all of the buildings at UCF were older and the school didn’t have the funds to repair the damage to the classrooms, the decrepit atmosphere would not be as big of a deal as it is, but seeing as UCF is a top notch school and I assume possesses sufficient funds, repairing a few classrooms should not be a major deal.
I often wonder how old the Math and Physics building is. I assume the building is fairly old based on the classrooms, but I wonder if the building structure itself is safe. I sat in a chair with a spring sticking out and maybe I was fortunate that the spring only cut my shirt instead of me.
No comments:
Post a Comment